Was Robin Hood's point of view ethically sound?
Sep 7, 2019 · Such moral-testing is open to self-serving prejudices about who is worthy of aid. These can be racist, like the debunked idea of "welfare queens". Or they can be circular moral judgements: "if they were a good, hard working person they wouldn't be poor". Or "they'll drink it away" while alcoholism and drug abuse are diseases exasperated by poverty.
ethics - Warren's distinction between moral humanity and genetic ...
Mar 8, 2018 · Explain Warren's distinction between moral humanity and genetic humanity. What, according to Warren, are the 5 criteria for being considered of being a moral person. And why does she maintain that the active presence and not merely the potentiality of these five criteria is sufficient and necessary for constituting a moral person?
What, if anything, is the difference between ethics and moral …
In another article (perhaps her most famous), "Moral Saints" (in The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 79, No. 8 [August 1982], pages 419-439), Wolf argues for this point by using as an example a figure she dubs "the moral saint"--"a person whose every action is as morally good as possible, a person, that is, who is as morally worthy as can be" (419 ...
ethics - Morality is subjective? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
Aug 22, 2020 · To say that morality is subjective, that it varies from person to person, does not preclude it from existing objectively in each person. So, atheist moral objectivists may be right in saying that our morality is hardwired in us — and even softwired in neurological synapses in our brain — but that doesn't mean it's not subjective. It may ...
What is the difference between 'immoral', 'amoral' and 'non-moral ...
An immoral person knows something is wrong but does it anyway. An amoral person does not have a sense of right and wrong. Something that is unmoral exists outside the bounds of what could be considered right and wrong—such as an animal or weather pattern.
Are there always non-moral reasons to act morally?
Mar 27, 2021 · non-moral reasons to be moral" implies that a person acts according to morals only for "moral reasons", which is a pleonasm. You are suggesting that the reason for being moral is being moral. So, you are missing the purpose of morals.
ethics - Scenario: is this moral? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
In your first case where there is an incidental and unintentional moral benefit to what is otherwise an immoral act, is just that: the person acted immorally but there was a benefit elsewhere. The benefit doesn't erase the immoral action, which was undertaken with full malicious intent by …
Highest scored 'moral-agency' questions - Philosophy Stack …
Feb 28, 2019 · A moral agent is something that is culpable for the outcome of actions taken. What this implies can be radically different depending upon the school of thought, metaphysical relationship held, as well as other factors.
Aristotle's Ethics - Moral Responsibility - Philosophy Stack Exchange
May 21, 2017 · To Aristotle, ethics is an inductive science, built from given human nature and human society. He urges us to choose the good as the mark due to the human condition. For this reason, Aristotle maintains that, to be a moral agent, a …
ethics - How do we judge if an action is moral or not if there are ...
Jun 21, 2022 · A person will either be sufficiently persuaded by a framework (and/or by the solution to which the framework leads), or they will remain undecided and fall into a moral dilemma/trilemma (etc) as a result of being unable to resolve which framework is best.